Introduction

If you watched the Chicago Bulls take on the Milwaukee Bucks this NBA season, you already know things got intense. Two Central Division rivals, two completely different outcomes in their two meetings, and some jaw-dropping individual performances that deserve a much closer look.

The Chicago Bulls Crush Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats from the 2025-26 season tell a compelling story of a rivalry that swung wildly in both directions. Milwaukee dominated the first meeting in early February. Chicago came back with a vengeance in March. Between the two games, you get a masterclass in what changes when momentum, effort, and execution shift.

In this article, you get a complete breakdown of every key performer across both matchups. We cover the scoring leaders, the role players who stepped up, the defensive standouts, and the numbers that most coverage ignores. By the end, you will know exactly what happened on the floor and why.

---

Game 1: Milwaukee Wins Big at Home (February 4, 2026)

Milwaukee hosted Chicago at Fiserv Forum on February 4. The Bucks came out blazing and never looked back. Final score: Milwaukee Bucks 131, Chicago Bulls 115.

The Bucks dominated from tip-off. They outscored Chicago 39 to 24 in the first quarter and never let the Bulls get comfortable. Chicago fought back in the third quarter, outscoring Milwaukee 37 to 28, but the deficit was already too large to overcome by then.

Team Stats at a Glance: Game 1

Here is a quick snapshot of how the two teams compared overall:

Milwaukee Bucks:

• Field Goal Percentage: 51.5%
• Three-Point Percentage: 60.5% (an extraordinary number)
• Total Rebounds: 61
• Assists: 33
• Turnovers: 14
• Points in the Paint: 46
• Bench Points: 45

Chicago Bulls:

• Field Goal Percentage: 44.0%
• Three-Point Percentage: 37.3%
• Total Rebounds: 52
• Assists: 26
• Turnovers: 10
• Points in the Paint: 40
• Bench Points: 30

Milwaukee’s three-point shooting at 60.5% was the single biggest factor in this game. You do not shoot that percentage from deep and lose. Chicago, despite committing only 10 turnovers (compared to Milwaukee’s 14), simply could not match that level of efficiency.

Milwaukee’s Key Performers in Game 1

Kyle Kuzma: The Undisputed Star

Kyle Kuzma was the best player on the floor in Game 1 and it was not particularly close. He finished with 31 points, 10 rebounds, and 6 assists. He shot 54.5% from the field and 60.0% from three. He scored 16 points in the paint, attacked the basket relentlessly, and made Milwaukee’s offense look impossible to guard.

His efficiency rating was 36, the highest of any player in the game. He had a true shooting percentage of 61.8%. If you want to understand why Milwaukee won so convincingly, start with Kuzma’s performance.

Ryan Rollins: A Hidden Gem

Ryan Rollins came off the bench and delivered a double-double. He finished with 21 points and 10 assists. He shot 5 of 8 from beyond the arc (62.5%) and added 7 rebounds. His plus/minus was plus-9 for the game.

Rollins ran the offense beautifully when called upon and made smart decisions throughout. He was arguably the second-best player in the entire game.

Gary Trent Jr.: Efficient Scoring Punch

Gary Trent Jr. added 15 points shooting a remarkable 5 of 8 from three-point range. His true shooting percentage was 83.3%, which shows just how efficient Milwaukee’s perimeter attack was in this game.

Pete Nance: Quietly Dominant

Pete Nance contributed 15 points and 8 rebounds while shooting 75.0% from the field and 60.0% from three. He went 3 for 5 from deep and played with impressive energy. His efficiency game score was 15.2. Nance was a big reason Milwaukee’s second unit kept the pressure on all night.

Myles Turner: Solid but Foul-Prone

Myles Turner added 15 points and 4 rebounds but picked up 4 turnovers and 3 fouls. He shot 50.0% from the field with some solid three-point work (2 of 3 from deep). Turner contributed but his decision-making in the fourth quarter left something to be desired.

Jericho Sims: Hustle Off the Bench

Jericho Sims grabbed 9 rebounds and scored 9 points in a limited role. He came up with huge plays around the basket and provided energy that helped Milwaukee maintain its lead in the second half.

---

Chicago’s Key Performers in Game 1

Matas Buzelis: Chicago’s Best Player

Matas Buzelis was the brightest spot for Chicago in a losing effort. He scored 22 points on 50.0% shooting, including 5 of 10 from three-point range. He also swatted 5 shots, which was dominant defensively for a forward.

Buzelis showed real two-way ability in this game. His 5 blocks were a standout number. He was a problem for Milwaukee near the basket and showed genuine scoring range on the perimeter. At just 21 years old, this performance hinted at a very bright future.

Coby White: Double-Double Effort in a Loss

Coby White put up 21 points and 10 rebounds in the loss. He shot 41.2% from the field and earned 7 free throw attempts. His double-double shows effort and production, even if Milwaukee made his defensive assignments a nightmare all night.

Ayo Dosunmu: Quiet Efficiency

Ayo Dosunmu scored 17 points with 8 assists and just 1 turnover. His 8-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio was outstanding. He shot 50.0% overall and 50.0% from three. On another night, this kind of performance wins games. In Game 1, Milwaukee was simply too good.

Jalen Smith: Shooting the Lights Out

Jalen Smith had one of the more underappreciated games of the night. He scored 16 points on 71.4% shooting and an eye-popping true shooting percentage of 96.2%. He hit 3 of 5 threes and was one of the most efficient Bulls on the night. Had his teammates matched his efficiency, the result might have been different.

---

Game 2: Chicago’s Dominant Revenge (March 1, 2026)

The rematch at United Center on March 1 was a completely different story. Chicago controlled this game from start to finish and delivered a blowout. Final score: Chicago Bulls 120, Milwaukee Bucks 97.

After falling behind by 2 at halftime (Milwaukee led 66 to 51 at the break), the Bulls erupted. They outscored the Bucks 36 to 23 in the third quarter and then delivered a stunning 33 to 8 fourth quarter to put the game away.

Let that fourth quarter number sink in. The Bucks scored just 8 points in the final period. That is an absolute defensive masterclass.

Team Stats at a Glance: Game 2

Chicago Bulls:

• Field Goal Percentage: 51.2%
• Three-Point Percentage: 36.7%
• Points in the Paint: 50
• Steals: 14
• Assists: 34
• Bench Points: 48
• Biggest Lead: 23

Milwaukee Bucks:

• Field Goal Percentage: 36.8% (dramatically worse than Game 1)
• Three-Point Percentage: 28.3%
• Points in the Paint: 26
• Steals: 9
• Assists: 26
• Bench Points: 45
• Biggest Lead: 16 (in the first half only)

Chicago’s 14 steals were remarkable. The Bulls created chaos on defense and turned those steals into easy transition points. Their points off turnovers totaled 20. They controlled the paint, generated second-chance looks, and turned what looked like a potential loss at halftime into a commanding victory.

Chicago’s Key Performers in Game 2

Collin Sexton: Leading Scorer and Catalyst

Collin Sexton was Chicago’s most impactful scorer in the rematch. He dropped 22 points on 9 of 14 shooting (64.3%), including 3 of 8 from three and a perfect 6 of 6 from two-point range. He also contributed 2 assists and 3 steals.

His fast-break game was on full display. He converted 3 fast-break opportunities and scored 7 fast-break points. His true shooting percentage was 76.2%, making him the most efficient scorer in the game. Sexton was aggressive, decisive, and relentless.

Leonard Miller: A Standout Performance

Leonard Miller gave Chicago a massive performance in Game 2. He scored 15 points on an absurd 75.0% shooting, going a perfect 2 of 4 from three and 4 of 4 on two-pointers. He added 5 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 blocks, and 1 steal.

His efficiency game score was 17.5 and his true shooting percentage was 88.9%. His offensive rating in this game was 163.6. Simply put, Miller was everywhere. He made the right plays, hit the right shots, and gave Milwaukee’s defense no answers.

Tre Jones: Running the Show

Tre Jones scored 13 points and dished out 6 assists. He hit 4 of 9 shots overall and went 1 for 3 from three. His 2-to-3 assist-to-turnover ratio was serviceable, and his 4-of-4 free throw shooting showed composure under pressure.

Jones ran Chicago’s half-court sets with intelligence and kept the offense organized during a period when the team needed calm leadership.

Nick Richards: Anchoring the Interior

Nick Richards contributed 11 points and 7 rebounds at center. He scored 10 of his points in the paint. He grabbed rebounds, contested shots (blocking 1), and gave Chicago a physical interior presence that Milwaukee had no real answer for in the second half.

Isaac Okoro: The Two-Way Wing

Isaac Okoro scored 7 points but his defensive impact was clear. He racked up 2 steals and 4 rebounds. His activity level on defense helped fuel Chicago’s relentless second-half pressure.

Milwaukee’s Key Performers in Game 2

Bobby Portis: Milwaukee’s Most Consistent Player

Bobby Portis was Milwaukee’s best player in Game 2 with 18 points and 5 rebounds. He shot 50.0% from the field and 37.5% from three. He scored 10 second-chance points, which shows his physicality and offensive rebounding (he grabbed 2 offensive boards). His true shooting percentage was 62.3%.

Portis fought hard but could not drag Milwaukee through what became an overwhelming Chicago second half.

Cam Thomas: Points but Poor Efficiency

Cam Thomas scored 15 points but needed 11 field goal attempts and 10 free throw attempts to get there. He shot just 27.3% from the field. His points came primarily at the line, where he made 8 of 10. He generated fouls effectively but could not score efficiently enough to make a real difference.

AJ Green: The One Bright Spot from Deep

AJ Green hit 4 of 11 threes (36.4%) for 13 points. His three-point shooting kept Milwaukee at least somewhat competitive in the first half. Once Chicago’s defense locked in during the third and fourth quarters, Green disappeared.

Ryan Rollins: Below His Game 1 Level

Ryan Rollins followed up his brilliant Game 1 performance with a more modest showing. He scored 11 points with 7 assists and 7 rebounds. His 5 turnovers were costly. He shot just 16.7% from three, a sharp contrast to his first performance.

Kevin Porter Jr.: Struggles All Night

Kevin Porter Jr. had a rough evening. He scored 10 points but shot only 25.0% from the field (4 of 16). He also picked up a technical foul. His plus/minus was minus-23, tied for the worst on the team with Kyle Kuzma. Chicago’s defense made his evening miserable.

Head-to-Head Player Comparison Across Both Games

Here is how the key performers stacked up across both matchups:

Kyle Kuzma (MIL): 31 pts / 10 reb / 6 ast in Game 1. Followed by 10 pts on 80.0% shooting in Game 2, but a minus-24 showing.

Bobby Portis (MIL): Absent in Game 1 statistics, emerged as Milwaukee’s best in Game 2 with 18 points.

Collin Sexton (CHI): His 22-point Game 2 performance was one of the cleanest scoring outputs in the series.

Matas Buzelis (CHI): 22 points and 5 blocks in Game 1 showed his ceiling. His two-way impact stood out as a major reason for optimism around this Bulls roster.

Coby White (CHI): Double-double (21 pts / 10 reb) in Game 1 showed heart and competitive spirit even in defeat.

Leonard Miller (CHI): His Game 2 efficiency (88.9% true shooting) was the single most eye-catching individual number across both games.

What the Numbers Really Tell You

You can read the box scores and get the surface story. But look deeper and some patterns jump out.

Chicago won Game 2 because of defense. Fourteen steals. A 33-to-8 fourth quarter. A defensive rating of 87.8 in a single game. That is elite-level defensive basketball. The Bulls did not just outlast Milwaukee. They suffocated them.

Milwaukee won Game 1 because of three-point shooting. A 60.5% mark from beyond the arc is not sustainable. You can expect that rate to regress. And when it did in Game 2, the Bucks had no answers. Their effective field goal percentage dropped from 63.4% to 43.7% between the two games. That drop tells you everything.

Chicago’s bench also made a significant difference in Game 2. The Bulls put up 48 bench points, compared to 30 in Game 1. Role players like Leonard Miller and Collin Sexton stepped up and delivered when the starters needed support.

Season Context: Where Both Teams Stand

The two head-to-head results in 2025-26 split evenly between the teams. Each won one game. But the manner of Chicago’s Game 2 victory, a 23-point blowout with a near-perfect fourth quarter defensively, suggests a Bulls team that is building something real.

Milwaukee’s inconsistency, shown by a 60.5% three-point performance one night and a 28.3% performance the next, highlights a team that can look unbeatable on some nights and ordinary on others.

For Bulls fans, the growth of players like Matas Buzelis, Leonard Miller, and the veteran contributions from Collin Sexton and Tre Jones give real reason for excitement going forward.

Conclusion

The Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks player stats from the 2025-26 season reveal a rivalry full of contrast. Milwaukee’s Game 1 dominance was built on historic three-point shooting and Kyle Kuzma’s virtuoso 31-point, 10-rebound performance. Chicago’s Game 2 revenge was built on suffocating defense, balanced scoring, and an unforgettable fourth quarter.

Both games gave you stars to watch, role players to appreciate, and stat lines that reward a deeper look. Whether you are a Bulls fan celebrating the comeback win or a Bucks fan searching for answers after that 33-8 fourth quarter, the numbers here give you the full picture.

Which player’s performance surprised you the most? Drop your thoughts and let the debate begin.

FAQs: Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats

Q1: What was the final score of the most recent Bulls vs Bucks game? The most recent matchup ended with the Chicago Bulls winning 120-97 on March 1, 2026.

Q2: Who was the leading scorer for Chicago in their two games against Milwaukee? Collin Sexton led the Bulls in Game 2 with 22 points. Matas Buzelis led in Game 1 with 22 points.

Q3: Who was the leading scorer for Milwaukee across both games? Kyle Kuzma was Milwaukee’s standout performer with 31 points in Game 1. Bobby Portis led the Bucks in Game 2 with 18 points.

Q4: How many steals did the Bulls record in Game 2? Chicago recorded an impressive 14 steals in their Game 2 victory over Milwaukee.

Q5: What was Milwaukee’s three-point percentage in Game 1? Milwaukee shot an extraordinary 60.5% from three-point range in their Game 1 victory.

Q6: How did Leonard Miller perform in Game 2 against the Bucks? Leonard Miller scored 15 points on 75.0% shooting with 4 assists, 2 blocks, and a true shooting percentage of 88.9%.

Q7: What happened in the fourth quarter of Game 2? Chicago outscored Milwaukee 33 to 8 in the fourth quarter, turning a tight game into a 23-point blowout.

Q8: How did Matas Buzelis perform defensively against Milwaukee? Buzelis recorded 5 blocks in Game 1, one of the most dominant defensive performances by a forward in the matchup.

Q9: Did any player record a double-double in the Bulls vs Bucks games? Yes. Kyle Kuzma (31 pts / 10 reb), Ryan Rollins (21 pts / 10 ast), and Coby White (21 pts / 10 reb) all recorded double-doubles across the two games.

Q10: Who had the worst plus/minus in Game 2 for Milwaukee? Kevin Porter Jr. and Kyle Kuzma both posted a minus-23 plus/minus rating in Game 2, reflecting how badly Chicago controlled the second half.

Also Read Encyclopediausa.co.uk

About the Author: Jordan Rivers is a sports analyst and NBA writer with over eight years of experience covering professional basketball. He specializes in data-driven game breakdowns, player performance analysis, and long-form team coverage. Jordan has contributed to multiple sports media platforms and is passionate about making complex basketball statistics accessible to everyday fans.